Back To Top Skip to main content
Home

Call Us

  • About Us
    • Our Attorneys
    • Contingency-Fee Litigation
    • Verdicts and Settlements
    • Client Testimonials
    • Our Offices
  • Practice Areas
    • Practice Areas
    • Breach of Contract Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
    • Professional Malpractice
      • Accountant Malpractice
      • Legal Malpractice
      • Engineering Malpractice
  • Attorney Referrals
    • Referral FAQs
    • Send a Referral
    • View Our Brochure
  • News
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Locations
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

877 667 4265 Call us 24/7
home-for-sale

BTG Files Lawsuits For Fraudulent Misrepresentations in Two Property Sales

Firm News
July 18, 2019

Buying property can be a stressful process. Even more so when you realize that the property you just bought has a defect that was misrepresented or not disclosed to you prior to purchase.

Sellers of residential property are under a duty to disclose facts materially affecting the value of the property which are not readily observable and are not known to the buyer. This duty also extends to a seller’s real estate broker, who can also be liable to a buyer on the theories of negligence and fraudulent misrepresentation.

The Business Trial Group (BTG) recently filed two separate lawsuits where a home seller or realtor failed to disclose, or affirmatively misrepresented, a material issue to the buyer.

REAL ESTATE COMPANY FAILED TO DISCLOSE LEAD-BASED PAINT PRIOR TO PROPERTY SALE

After a Florida real estate company failed to disclose lead-based paint to the buyers of its residential property, BTG attorney Aaron C. Garnett filed a lawsuit on behalf of the new owners of the property.

Blue Star Home Solutions Incorporated is a real estate company that purchases property, renovates it, and sells it. After purchasing a residential property in Winter Park, Florida, Blue Star renovated it and listed it for sale.

According to the Complaint filed on May 7, 2019, Blue Star and Plaintiffs entered into a Residential Contract for Sale and Purchase concerning the property on or around August 17, 2016. Within the Contract, Blue Star represented that it knew of no facts materially affecting the value of the property which are not readily observable and which have not been disclosed to the buyer.

However, Blue Star knew that lead-based paint existed on the property at the time it executed the Contract. In addition to the Contract, Blue Star also represented to Plaintiffs in the Property Disclosure that no lead-based paint existed on the property.

Specifically, the Property Disclosure includes the question: “Does anything exist on the Property that may be considered an environmental hazard, including, but not limited to, lead-based paint?” To which, Blue Star Home Solutions responded “No.”

It was not until after taking possession of the property that the Plaintiffs learned that lead-based paint existed on the property, and that what the real estate solutions company had represented in the Contract and Property Disclosure were not true.

HOME SELLER AND AGENT FRAUDULENTLY MISREPRESENTED STRUCTURAL ISSUES OF CONDO

BTG attorney Aaron C. Garnett also recently filed a lawsuit on behalf of the current owners of a residential unit located at the Sea Gate Club, a condominium in Longboat Key, Florida. After taking possession of the property, the Plaintiffs learned that the condo seller and real estate agent had failed to disclose a structural condition that affected the value and desirability of the property.

According to the Complaint filed on May 10, 2019, between 2008 and 2017, the former owner of the condo unit was a member of the board of directors for the Sea Gate Club Condominium Association serving as, among other things, director, vice president, and president. In his role on the condo’s board, the former owner knew that the condominium required a comprehensive building envelope restoration that would cost millions.

This comprehensive building envelope restoration would require all existing windows to be removed and replaced with impact-resistant, code-conforming windows. It would also require the existing gypsum-based plaster exterior finish to be removed and replaced with code conforming stucco. The restoration would also include repairing all spalled and delaminated concrete materials from columns and slabs, as well as installing a high-quality, high-build acrylic paint with appropriate primers and conditioners.

After learning about the comprehensive building envelope restoration, the former condo owner hired licensed real estate broker Michael Saunders & Company to sell the property. On July 27, 2016, the licensed real estate agent with Saunders & Company listed the property for sale.

Then, on or around February 14, 2018, the Plaintiffs and the former owner entered into a Residential Contract for Sale and Purchase concerning the Property.

In the Contract, the former owner represented that he knew of “no facts materially affecting the value of the Real Property which are not readily observable and which have not been disclosed to Buyer.” However, he did know of several facts materially affecting the value of the property – in particular the comprehensive building envelope restoration.

The former owner also knew that it would cost between $8 million to $9 million for the comprehensive building envelope restoration. He also knew that the $8 million to $9 million cost would be paid by the individual condo unit owners, and that he would have to pay a large assessment if he continued to own the property.

In addition to what the property owner declared in the property disclosure, the real estate agent also misrepresented the condition of the property during his meetings with the plaintiffs. The real estate agent represented that there were no structural conditions affecting the value or desirability of the property, as well as no upcoming assessments or special assessments in connection with the property.

Both the former owner and the real estate agent knew or had reason to know that the statements they made to plaintiffs were not accurate or truthful when those statements were made.

WHY YOU SHOULD HIRE BTG FOR REAL ESTATE LITIGATION

Property sellers and real estate agents must disclose a property’s known defects or structural deficiencies. These problems could cost tenants money down the line, and it is neither ethical nor legal for a seller or an agent to obscure such information.

As the commercial litigation department of the nation’s largest contingency-fee law firm, the Business Trial Group is uniquely positioned to fight for our real estate clients. Our experienced attorneys charge no hourly fees, and no fees at all unless we recover money for you.

If you are a buyer who feels that a seller has failed to disclose material defects in a property you purchased, contact us via our no-fee, no-obligation form or call 888-343-8073.

Free Case Evaluation

Tell us about your situation so we can get started fighting for you. We tailor each case to meet our clients' needs.

Recent news

Morgan & Morgan wins $2.6 Million FINRA Arbitration Award Against Robert W. Baird & Co.

November 15, 2023

Morgan & Morgan wins $840,000 Jury Verdict for Sotheby’s Real Estate Brokerage

August 7, 2023

Business Trial Group Wins Victory Affirming Widow’s Right to Inherit Husband’s Estate

January 19, 2022

BTG Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Caregiver Alleging Failure to Pay for Years of Around-the-Clock In-Home Care

August 31, 2021

FINRA’s New Rule Limits Brokers From Being Named as Customers’ Beneficiaries

November 16, 2020
 
lexisnexis-logo

Need A Business Litigation Lawyer? Contact Us

Offices in all 50 states

Your local office

Backed by the resources of one of the nation’s largest plaintiffs’ law firm, the Business Trial Group handles cases in Florida and throughout the country. Though Morgan & Morgan has over offices in all 50 states, you do not have to live near one of our locations to benefit from our service.

Click to view

703 Waterford Way, Suite 1050,
Miami, FL 33126

(305) 929-1900
Find nearest office View all offices
Business Trial Group | Contingency-Fee Lawyers
877.667.4265
24 hours / 7 days a week. Se habla español.
Morgan & Morgan Lawyers | America's Largest Personal Injury Law Firm

Business Trial Group

Contigency Free Litigation

  • About Us
  • Our Offices
  • Client Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Practice Areas

  • Construction Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Professional Malpractice

Referrals

  • Attorney Referrals
  • Our Brochure

Legal

  • Disclaimer & Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Call Us

Free Case Evaluation

 

Sidebar image block

lexisnexis-logo

Other areas

Breach of Contract Litigation
Business Tort Litigation
Construction Litigation
Defamation Litigation
Employment Litigation
Intellectual Property Litigation
Professional Malpractice
Probate, Trust & Estate Litigation
Securities and Stockbroker Fraud
Unpaid Commissions and Compensation

Why Clients Trust Us

“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group handled my case against a major security company. I was amazed at the amount I received in the lawsuit. Not only was their research for the case very thorough, their concern for me and all those involved with the case was heartwarming and set me at ease.”
- N.D.
“I obtained excellent service, and my attorneys did everything possible to promptly resolve my case. The lawyers who helped me, Benjamin Webster and Arletys Rodriguez, are excellent professionals with infinite human quality.”
- C.F.
“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group helped our family get through a rough time in representing us on a breach of an oral contract. Our group of lawyers, William and Arletys, were highly professional, knowledgeable, caring, reliable, and very compassionate with all of us, especially to our 92-year-old father.”
- de la Paz family
“I want to express my sincere appreciation for representing me in a case against my debtors. Not only were you successful in obtaining an equitable judgment on my behalf, but it was done is such a manner that made it affordable … even for me!”
- B.M.
“I had to reread the documentation to make sure it was not a dream. I cannot thank you enough for handling this to a full-payment settlement. You did a fantastic job in a ridiculous situation.”
- C.S.