Back To Top Skip to main content
Home

Call Us

  • About Us
    • Our Attorneys
    • Contingency-Fee Litigation
    • Verdicts and Settlements
    • Client Testimonials
    • Our Offices
  • Practice Areas
    • Practice Areas
    • Breach of Contract Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
    • Professional Malpractice
      • Accountant Malpractice
      • Legal Malpractice
      • Engineering Malpractice
  • Attorney Referrals
    • Referral FAQs
    • Send a Referral
    • View Our Brochure
  • News
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Locations
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

877 667 4265 Call us 24/7
investments-2

5 Noteworthy Investment Fraud Charges of 2019

Investor Alerts
December 23, 2019

Below is a roundup of some of the most noteworthy enforcement actions the SEC and FINRA brought in 2019. The SEC brought 862 enforcement actions in Fiscal Year 2019, according to a report by the SEC’s Division of Enforcement. FINRA hasn’t released its 2019 data yet.

If you have been a victim to misconduct similar to any of the actions described below, please contact the Business Trial Group at Morgan & Morgan today at 800-816-1031.

Our attorneys regularly fight against brokerage firms, investment advisory firms, and banks to help investors recover their financial losses. We have helped investors recover tens of millions of dollars of investment losses.

Merrill Lynch & Raymond James Firms to Pay $12M for Supervisory Failures Involving 529 Plan Share Classes

In November, FINRA ordered Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, Raymond James & Associates, Inc., and Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. to pay approximately $12 million total in restitution for charging excessive fees on client investments in 529 savings plans. 529 plans, which are tax-advantaged municipal securities, are designed to encourage saving for the future educational expenses of a designated beneficiary.  According to FINRA, Merrill Lynch and Raymond James failed to reasonably supervise 529 plan recommendations.

Two BMO Advisors to Pay $37M For Failing to Disclose Conflicts of Interest

According to the SEC, BMO Harris Financial Advisors Inc. (BMO Harris) and BMO Asset Management Corp. (BMO Asset Mgmt) preferred mutual funds managed by BMO Asset Mgmt when they were selecting investments in their retail investment advisory program, known as the Managed Asset Allocation Program (MAAP).

The two advisors invested approximately 50% of MAAP client assets in the BMO Asset Mgmt proprietary funds. This practice resulted in payment of additional management fees to BMO Asset Mgmt.  But the SEC’s order found that neither BMO adviser disclosed this practice or the conflicts of interest to clients.

Blockchain Company to Pay $24 Million Penalty for Unregistered ICO

In September, the SEC ordered blockchain technology company Block.one to pay a $24 million penalty for conducting an unregistered initial coin offering (ICO) of digital tokens that raised the equivalent of several billion dollars over one year. 

According to the SEC’s order, Block.one conducted an ICO between June 2017 and June 2018. However, Block.one did not register its ICO as a securities offering pursuant to the federal securities laws, nor did it qualify for or seek an exemption from the registration requirements.

Ami Forte and Charles Lawrence Barred for Roles in Churning Accounts of Elderly Client with Dementia

In October, FINRA barred Ami Forte and Charles Lawrence of Florida for their respective roles in churning accounts belonging to a 79-year-old customer who suffered from severe cognitive impairment.

Forte first met the customer in the late 1990s, at which time the two developed a romantic and business relationship. Forte, who maintained near daily contact with the client, used her position of trust and confidence to exploit the client and generate excessive commissions.

According to FINRA, the Forte Group – which Forte established in 2001 and Lawrence joined at its inception – effected more than 2,800 trades in the customer’s accounts from September 2011 through June 2012, generating approximately $9 million in commissions. FINRA alleged that over half of these transactions involved short-term trading in long-maturity bonds, which usually are intended for customers with long-term investment horizons.

Court Ordered $1 Billion Judgment Against Operators of Woodbridge Ponzi Scheme 

At the start of this year, a federal court in Florida ordered Woodbridge Group of Companies LLC and its former owner to pay $1 billion in penalties and disgorgement for operating a Ponzi scheme that targeted retail investors.

In December 2017, the SEC filed an emergency action charging the company and other defendants with operating a massive $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme that allegedly defrauded 8,400 retail investors nationwide, many of them seniors who had invested retirement funds. The SEC’s complaint alleged that former owner and CEO Robert H. Shapiro made Ponzi payments to investors and used a web of shell companies to conceal the scheme.

Free Case Evaluation

Tell us about your situation so we can get started fighting for you. We tailor each case to meet our clients' needs.

Recent news

Morgan & Morgan wins $2.6 Million FINRA Arbitration Award Against Robert W. Baird & Co.

November 15, 2023

Morgan & Morgan wins $840,000 Jury Verdict for Sotheby’s Real Estate Brokerage

August 7, 2023

Business Trial Group Wins Victory Affirming Widow’s Right to Inherit Husband’s Estate

January 19, 2022

BTG Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Caregiver Alleging Failure to Pay for Years of Around-the-Clock In-Home Care

August 31, 2021

FINRA’s New Rule Limits Brokers From Being Named as Customers’ Beneficiaries

November 16, 2020
 
lexisnexis-logo

Need A Business Litigation Lawyer? Contact Us

Offices in all 50 states

Your local office

Backed by the resources of one of the nation’s largest plaintiffs’ law firm, the Business Trial Group handles cases in Florida and throughout the country. Though Morgan & Morgan has over offices in all 50 states, you do not have to live near one of our locations to benefit from our service.

Click to view

703 Waterford Way, Suite 1050,
Miami, FL 33126

(305) 929-1900
Find nearest office View all offices
Business Trial Group | Contingency-Fee Lawyers
877.667.4265
24 hours / 7 days a week. Se habla español.
Morgan & Morgan Lawyers | America's Largest Personal Injury Law Firm

Business Trial Group

Contigency Free Litigation

  • About Us
  • Our Offices
  • Client Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Practice Areas

  • Construction Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Professional Malpractice

Referrals

  • Attorney Referrals
  • Our Brochure

Legal

  • Disclaimer & Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Call Us

Free Case Evaluation

 

Sidebar image block

lexisnexis-logo

Other areas

Breach of Contract Litigation
Business Tort Litigation
Construction Litigation
Defamation Litigation
Employment Litigation
Intellectual Property Litigation
Professional Malpractice
Probate, Trust & Estate Litigation
Securities and Stockbroker Fraud
Unpaid Commissions and Compensation

Why Clients Trust Us

“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group handled my case against a major security company. I was amazed at the amount I received in the lawsuit. Not only was their research for the case very thorough, their concern for me and all those involved with the case was heartwarming and set me at ease.”
- N.D.
“I obtained excellent service, and my attorneys did everything possible to promptly resolve my case. The lawyers who helped me, Benjamin Webster and Arletys Rodriguez, are excellent professionals with infinite human quality.”
- C.F.
“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group helped our family get through a rough time in representing us on a breach of an oral contract. Our group of lawyers, William and Arletys, were highly professional, knowledgeable, caring, reliable, and very compassionate with all of us, especially to our 92-year-old father.”
- de la Paz family
“I want to express my sincere appreciation for representing me in a case against my debtors. Not only were you successful in obtaining an equitable judgment on my behalf, but it was done is such a manner that made it affordable … even for me!”
- B.M.
“I had to reread the documentation to make sure it was not a dream. I cannot thank you enough for handling this to a full-payment settlement. You did a fantastic job in a ridiculous situation.”
- C.S.