Back To Top Skip to main content
Home

Call Us

  • About Us
    • Our Attorneys
    • Contingency-Fee Litigation
    • Verdicts and Settlements
    • Client Testimonials
    • Our Offices
  • Practice Areas
    • Practice Areas
    • Breach of Contract Litigation
    • Construction Litigation
    • Employment Litigation
    • Professional Malpractice
      • Accountant Malpractice
      • Legal Malpractice
      • Engineering Malpractice
  • Attorney Referrals
    • Referral FAQs
    • Send a Referral
    • View Our Brochure
  • News
  • FAQs
  • Contact Us
  • Locations
  • Practice Areas
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

877 667 4265 Call us 24/7
FINRA-arbitration

Navigating FINRA Arbitration: How to Find Justice in an Unbalanced System

General
June 27, 2016

In many industries, victims of fraud and misconduct have the option of filing a lawsuit and seeking a just resolution from a judge and jury. For many investors and securities industry employees, however, the available legal options are far more limited. For them, FINRA arbitration is mandatory.

What does it take to prevail against Wall Street?

The New York Times’ recent coverage of arbitration between Barclays Capital and a former Barclays employee perfectly demonstrates why FINRA arbitration can be so challenging for individuals going up against massive securities firms.

William Thomas Pair worked for Barclays Capital for several years, having been recruited from his previous position at UBS. To convince Pair to join Barclays, the firm offered him a $1 million forgivable loan, which would be paid off after several years of employment.

At one point, Pair’s loan was renegotiated to pertain to Barclays Bank, a British company, which means it should not have been subject to mandatory FINRA arbitration.

Several months before that 7-year mark, Barclays fired Pair and assigned his outstanding $600,000 loan balance back to U.S.-based Barclays Capital.

Barclays then filed for FINRA arbitration against Pair, who chose to represent himself. Barclays, on the other hand, was represented by highly paid outside legal counsel.

The arbitrators chose to throw out the former broker’s key witness for unclear reasons. Pair lost, and no sufficient explanation was given for why Barclays had passed the outstanding balance back from its British owner to the U.S. subsidiary.

As a result, Pair was ordered to pay back not only the $600,000, but also $20,000 in unpaid interest and $360,000 for Barclays’ attorney fees.

Pair’s story is, unfortunately, not an unusual outcome in FINRA arbitration. In fact, in 2013, securities customers were awarded some portion of their claimed damages in only 42% of arbitrations.

The mechanics of FINRA arbitration

The challenges involved in FINRA arbitration are complex and fairly institutionalized, but navigating them is possible.

As an independent non-profit, FINRA exists to create and enforce securities regulations for the protection of investors and the overall health of the securities industry.

The challenges for victims of securities industry misconduct center around two major concerns.

First, when you pay for the brokerage services of a securities firm, in most cases you sign away your right to a trial. This is also the case for employees of banks and brokerages who wish to resolve legal disputes with their employers.

Securities firms have powerful outside counsel at their beck and call, which means that standing up against them in arbitration—and prevailing— is a tall and often expensive order. As the Barclays case demonstrated, losing in arbitration can result in a former employee or investor being liable for the firm’s legal costs.

Second, arbitration panels are often far from neutral. Though they are required to remain impartial, the reality is that arbitrators are paid based on how many arbitrations they handle, and if they become known for giving Claimants favorable awards, the banks and brokerages will not use them. There have been past instances demonstrating some arbitrators’ potential conflicts-of-interest.

How are FINRA arbitrators chosen?

Arbitrators are charged with the weighty responsibility of deciding whether those who file claims deserve an award. FINRA maintains a roster of over 6,000 arbitrators.

In order to become certified, arbitrators must complete approximately 10 hours of coursework and an entrance exam.

According to research conducted in 2009, the proportion of arbitrators affiliated with the financial services industry, in contrast to those who are not, is approximately 1 in 3.

This is reasonable in the sense that those with a securities background have first-hand knowledge of the nuances of the industry. It is concerning in the sense that some arbitrators may have strong ties to powerful securities firms, which could potentially color their decisions.

FINRA has reviewed this issue in response to concerns that it may cause bias, and has passed restrictions on who is eligible to serve as a public arbitrator. Still, the structure of the system as it stands may make individuals involved in FINRA arbitration feel that they are powerless against a biased system.

Why contingency-fee securities litigation matters

Corporations have a right to retain high-powered, high-earning legal teams to defend themselves. The problem is that the party bringing the claim often does not have equal resources to fight back.

At the Business Trial Group, we have seen the devastating impact that the power imbalance in favor of Wall Street can have on individual investors and employees. Many hard-working people have lost not just their investments, but their entire careers and livelihoods as a result of the misconduct of securities firms – only to suffer further losses in FINRA arbitration.

That’s why we combine highly qualified legal representation and securities specialization with a contingency-fee business model. In our experience, this is the most effective way to prevail against major investment firms.

It allows individual clients to take the time they need to build the strongest possible case without having to float the cost of expensive hourly attorneys’ fees.

Learn more about investors’ rights here, or contact us to learn how we could assist you with a FINRA arbitration claim.

Free Case Evaluation

Tell us about your situation so we can get started fighting for you. We tailor each case to meet our clients' needs.

Recent news

Morgan & Morgan wins $2.6 Million FINRA Arbitration Award Against Robert W. Baird & Co.

November 15, 2023

Morgan & Morgan wins $840,000 Jury Verdict for Sotheby’s Real Estate Brokerage

August 7, 2023

Business Trial Group Wins Victory Affirming Widow’s Right to Inherit Husband’s Estate

January 19, 2022

BTG Files Lawsuit on Behalf of Caregiver Alleging Failure to Pay for Years of Around-the-Clock In-Home Care

August 31, 2021

FINRA’s New Rule Limits Brokers From Being Named as Customers’ Beneficiaries

November 16, 2020
 
lexisnexis-logo

Need A Business Litigation Lawyer? Contact Us

Offices in all 50 states

Your local office

Backed by the resources of one of the nation’s largest plaintiffs’ law firm, the Business Trial Group handles cases in Florida and throughout the country. Though Morgan & Morgan has over offices in all 50 states, you do not have to live near one of our locations to benefit from our service.

Click to view

703 Waterford Way, Suite 1050,
Miami, FL 33126

(305) 929-1900
Find nearest office View all offices
Business Trial Group | Contingency-Fee Lawyers
877.667.4265
24 hours / 7 days a week. Se habla español.
Morgan & Morgan Lawyers | America's Largest Personal Injury Law Firm

Business Trial Group

Contigency Free Litigation

  • About Us
  • Our Offices
  • Client Testimonials
  • Contact Us
  • FAQs

Practice Areas

  • Construction Litigation
  • Employment Litigation
  • Professional Malpractice

Referrals

  • Attorney Referrals
  • Our Brochure

Legal

  • Disclaimer & Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy
© 2025 Business Trial Group

515 North Flagler Drive., Suite 2125, West Palm Beach, Florida 33401

Call Us

Free Case Evaluation

 

Sidebar image block

lexisnexis-logo

Other areas

Breach of Contract Litigation
Business Tort Litigation
Construction Litigation
Defamation Litigation
Employment Litigation
Intellectual Property Litigation
Professional Malpractice
Probate, Trust & Estate Litigation
Securities and Stockbroker Fraud
Unpaid Commissions and Compensation

Why Clients Trust Us

“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group handled my case against a major security company. I was amazed at the amount I received in the lawsuit. Not only was their research for the case very thorough, their concern for me and all those involved with the case was heartwarming and set me at ease.”
- N.D.
“I obtained excellent service, and my attorneys did everything possible to promptly resolve my case. The lawyers who helped me, Benjamin Webster and Arletys Rodriguez, are excellent professionals with infinite human quality.”
- C.F.
“The Morgan & Morgan Business Trial Group helped our family get through a rough time in representing us on a breach of an oral contract. Our group of lawyers, William and Arletys, were highly professional, knowledgeable, caring, reliable, and very compassionate with all of us, especially to our 92-year-old father.”
- de la Paz family
“I want to express my sincere appreciation for representing me in a case against my debtors. Not only were you successful in obtaining an equitable judgment on my behalf, but it was done is such a manner that made it affordable … even for me!”
- B.M.
“I had to reread the documentation to make sure it was not a dream. I cannot thank you enough for handling this to a full-payment settlement. You did a fantastic job in a ridiculous situation.”
- C.S.